1. How can you argue that a soft law should be applied instead of an actual arbitration rule that the parties are probably bound to? Can we even make such argument?
2. Where do you begin your research? Are there any particular resources you would recommend to us?
3. It seems that there are countries that have more “arbitration credibility.” That is, they are either often cited or praised as good law that other countries should follow. Would you agree that it is better to cite the rules of some countries instead of others? And if so, could you tell us which countries you recommend?
4. CIETAC has reformed some of its rules in reaction to a corruption scandal a few years ago, where arbitrators were found to have received bribes in exchange for deciding in favor of certain parties. Do you think that this means CIETAC rules are more strictly applied than other comparable rules?
5. Do you think that there is a difference between how aggressive males and females should act? Keeping in mind that we’re not supposed to be very aggressive, just strong advocates for our clients, is there the possibility that certain comments, mannerisms, or tones of voice that sounds ok in man, do not sound ok for women in arbitration?
No comments:
Post a Comment